Service / 03
AI workflow automation and agents
We map a complete business workflow and build the AI system that can move the work across existing tools, data, approvals, and exceptions.

An AI workflow, agent, or retrieval system that completes a defined process with measurable controls and human review where needed.
Why task automation often leaves the process slow
A workflow can begin in email, depend on a document, require data from a CRM, and finish with an approval in another system. People bridge those gaps by copying information, checking context, and deciding what should happen next.
A small automation can remove one repetitive action without changing the total cycle time. The queue simply moves to the next manual handoff. We start with the full route the work takes, including missing information, exceptions, approvals, and the systems that hold the source record.
Map the work before choosing the AI pattern
We observe how the workflow runs today and separate repeatable actions from decisions that need judgment. We record inputs, outputs, owners, access requirements, failure states, and the evidence a reviewer needs.
Only then do we choose the architecture. A deterministic workflow may be enough. A RAG system fits work that depends on retrieving company knowledge with source links. An agent fits a bounded task that needs to select tools or adapt its route. Some processes need a combination, but every component must have a clear job.
Systems we build
- AI workflows that move structured work between business systems
- RAG and knowledge systems that retrieve evidence before drafting an answer
- Agents that use approved tools inside explicit permission boundaries
- Human approval queues for commercial, legal, financial, or safety decisions
- Evaluation and observability layers that show what the system did and why it failed
How the system reaches production
The first release covers a bounded part of the workflow with a measurable baseline. We run it alongside the existing process, compare the outcome, and inspect the exceptions. Wider automation follows when the evidence supports it.
The production team receives operating documentation, access controls, evaluation cases, dashboards, and ownership for incidents and changes. The workflow remains understandable after the original build team leaves.
What we measure
The baseline comes from the process before automation. Depending on the workflow, we measure total cycle time, manual handling time, cost per case, completion rate, exception rate, quality, and the number of cases that need human correction.
The target is not the number of agent actions. The target is a business process that finishes sooner, costs less to run, or produces a more reliable result.
Start with the work
Bring the workflow that needs attention.
Pick a time for a working session or send a short brief. Either way, we will come prepared to understand where the work gets stuck.
Talk through the work
Book a 20-minute consultation.
Bring the workflow that feels slow or fragile. We will determine whether it is a sensible candidate for an AI system.
Bartosz LuderaFounder, HarnessloopChoose a time for a 20-minute consultation.
Send a workflow brief
Prefer to write it down?
Tell us where work waits, repeats, or falls through the cracks.
